Investigation of the reliability of semi-automatic annotation by the Geri time-lapse system.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the reliability of Geri® Assess 2.0 software time-lapse technology for annotating kinetic events and identifying abnormal phenotypes in preimplantation human embryos? DESIGN: Embryos were annotated using Assess 2.0 for the appearance and fading of pronuclei, and for progression to the 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-cell stages and to three blastocyst stages. Identification of reverse cleavage and direct cleavage phenotypes was also recorded. Manual annotation was undertaken after these events in a blinded fashion. Embryo scores were compared between Assess 2.0 and manual annotation. RESULTS: A total of 513 oocytes from 34 women were included. Detection rates for Assess 2.0 versus manual annotation among the 10 kinetic events and including direct cleavage and reverse cleavage ranged between 0% and 94.4%. The percentage of discordant pairs was significantly different for all 12 events analysed (P-value range 0.036 to <0.0001). The sensitivity of Assess 2.0 ranged from 68.2% to 94.4% and specificity ranged from 63.8% to 97.3%. Assess 2.0 called for verification by the embryologist for at least one event in 55.2% of oocytes assessed. Of the 297 embryos scored by manual annotation, Assess 2.0 assigned the same score for only 125 (42.1%), although after manual corrections, concordance with manual annotation scores was raised to 66.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal striking differences between Assess 2.0 and manual annotation for kinetic annotations. Failure of Assess 2.0 to detect direct cleavage events and the low detection rate of reverse cleavage are further limitations. These collective findings highlight the importance of validating time-lapse annotation software before clinical implementation. Manual verification of Assess 2.0 outputs remains essential for accurate data interpretation.

Unexpected Interacting Effects of Physical (Radiation) and Chemical (Bisphenol A) Treatments on Male Reproductive Functions in Mice.

For decades, numerous chemical pollutants have been described to interfere with endogenous hormone metabolism/signaling altering reproductive functions. Among these endocrine disrupting substances, Bisphenol A (BPA), a widely used compound, is known to negatively impact germ and somatic cells in the testis. Physical agents, such as ionizing radiation, were also described to perturb spermatogenesis. Despite the fact that we are constantly exposed to numerous environmental chemical and physical compounds, very few studies explore the impact of combined exposure to chemical and physical pollutants on reproductive health. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of fetal co-exposure to BPA and IR on testicular function in mice. We exposed pregnant mice to 10 µM BPA (corresponding to 0.5 mg/kg/day) in drinking water from 10.5 dpc until birth, and we irradiated mice with 0.2 Gy (γ-ray, RAD) at 12.5 days post-conception. Co-exposure to BPA and γ-ray induces DNA damage in fetal germ cells in an additive manner, leading to a long-lasting decrease in germ cell abundance. We also observed significant alteration of adult steroidogenesis by RAD exposure independently of the BPA exposure. This is illustrated by the downregulation of steroidogenic genes and the decrease of the number of adult Leydig cells. As a consequence, courtship behavior is modified, and male ultrasonic vocalizations associated with courtship decreased. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for the importance of broadening the concept of endocrine disruptors to include physical agents, leading to a reevaluation of risk management and regulatory decisions.

Validation of the French IVF guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is a symptom questionnaire as per the French IVF guidelines adequate for screening patients during the COVID-19 pandemic? DESIGN: Patients planning IVF from June 2020 to February 2021 were included in the study. In compliance with French IVF guidelines, all patients fever-free on the day of oocyte retrieval were screened for risk of COVID-19 by completing a symptom questionnaire after being counselled regarding the importance of a COVID-19-free medical practice. Patients with IVF planned between June and September 2020 only completed the questionnaire (group 1), while those planning IVF after September 2020 also underwent the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (group 2). Cycle cancellation rates between groups were compared. Group 1 patients consented for follicular fluid testing for SARS-CoV-2 and an interview after cycle completion to determine COVID-19 exposure during the 6 months before and after retrieval. RESULTS: Cycle cancellation rates for groups 1 and 2 were 0% (0/214) versus 1.4% (8/577), respectively, (P = 0.116). All 183 follicular fluid samples from group 1 were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Of 171 patients interviewed post-IVF, 16 (93.4%) developed COVID-19 symptoms or a positive real-time PCR (RT-PCR) RT-PCR test, but none within 2 months pre- or post-retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide reassurance that, consistent with the COVID-19 French IVF guidelines, use of a symptom questionnaire is effective in screening patients planning to undergo IVF. Failure to detect viral RNA in any follicular fluid sample does not negate the possibility that follicular fluid is a viral reservoir. However, the findings provide reassurance that the follicular environment in this study's carefully screened population was COVID-free.